Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:52:14 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com> Subject: Re: [RFCv2 PATCH 00/18] refcount_t API + usage On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:35:34PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > I think the refcount_t patch should also go to tip given it depends on > the kref patches. But that's up to Peter, he would know best... Yeah, so I held back on that and the kref conversion, because I wanted to get the kref fixup thingies in first. If there's no fallout from that I can stuff in the refcount_t bits.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.