Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:51:13 +0100 From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@...mni.ethz.ch>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] make call_usermodehelper a bit more "safe" On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:49:44PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's a second cut at my attempt to make call_usermodehelper a bit more > "safe". It includes some patches from my previous series, and one new > one. In all, this is a much smaller patchset, with better functionality > in the end. And of course, I miscounted the patches, there are only 3 patches in this series, yet I said 0/4 in this email, sorry about that. greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.