Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 22:16:23 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <>
To: Linus Torvalds <>
Cc: "" <>, 
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <>, David Laight <>, 
	Netdev <>, 
	Jean-Philippe Aumasson <>, LKML <>, 
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <>, "Daniel J . Bernstein" <>, 
	Eric Biggers <>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] siphash: add
 cryptographically secure hashtable function

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Linus Torvalds
<> wrote:
> I think you can/should just use the natural alignment for "u64".
> For architectures that need 8-byte alignment, u64 will already be
> properly aligned. For architectures (like x86-32) that only need
> 4-byte alignment, you get it.

I should have added mention of that with my previous email. For the
parameters that are always a multiple of u64 -- namely, the key -- I
now do that in v5 of the patchset. So this is already done.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.