[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 15:13:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>, "aik@...abs.ru" <aik@...abs.ru>,
"david@...son.dropbear.id.au" <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: Conversion from atomic_t to refcount_t: summary of issues
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 03:35:15PM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> So, could we agree on the following additions that are needed to refcount_t API:
>
> - refcount_long_t and all related functions
sed -e 's/refcount_/&long_/g' -e 's/atomic_/&long_/g'
-e 's/REFCOUNT_/&LONG_/g' -e 's/ATOMIC_/&LONG_/g'
-e 's/unsigned int/unsigned long/g' -e 's/UINT/ULONG/g'
I can do a proper patch once the interface settles down.
> - refcount_add(), refcount_sub(), refcount_sub_and_test()
> - refcount_dec_if_one()
See below, completely untested.
> - refcount_dec_return(), refcount_inc_return()
Skipped those.
---
Subject: refcount_t: A special purpose refcount type
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Mon Nov 14 18:06:19 CET 2016
Provide refcount_t, an atomic_t like primitive built just for
refcounting.
It provides saturation semantics such that overflow becomes impossible
and thereby 'spurious' use-after-free is avoided.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
include/linux/refcount.h | 262 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/Makefile | 3
2 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/refcount.h
@@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_REFCOUNT_H
+#define _LINUX_REFCOUNT_H
+
+/*
+ * Variant of atomic_t specialized for reference counts.
+ *
+ * The interface matches the atomic_t interface (to aid in porting) but only
+ * provides the few functions one should use for reference counting.
+ *
+ * It differs in that the counter saturates at UINT_MAX and will not move once
+ * there. This avoids wrapping the counter and causing 'spurious'
+ * use-after-free issues.
+ *
+ * Memory ordering rules are slightly relaxed wrt regular atomic_t functions
+ * and provide only what is strictly required for refcounts.
+ *
+ * The increments are fully relaxed; these will not provide ordering. The
+ * rationale is that whatever is used to obtain the object we're increasing the
+ * reference count on will provide the ordering. For locked data structures,
+ * its the lock acquire, for RCU/lockless data structures its the dependent
+ * load.
+ *
+ * Do note that inc_not_zero() provides a control dependency which will order
+ * future stores against the inc, this ensures we'll never modify the object
+ * if we did not in fact acquire a reference.
+ *
+ * The decrements will provide release order, such that all the prior loads and
+ * stores will be issued before, it also provides a control dependency, which
+ * will order us against the subsequent free().
+ *
+ * The control dependency is against the load of the cmpxchg (ll/sc) that
+ * succeeded. This means the stores aren't fully ordered, but this is fine
+ * because the 1->0 transition indicates no concurrency.
+ *
+ * Note that the allocator is responsible for ordering things between free()
+ * and alloc().
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
+typedef struct refcount_struct {
+ atomic_t refs;
+} refcount_t;
+
+#define REFCOUNT_INIT(n) { .refs = ATOMIC_INIT(n), }
+
+static inline void refcount_set(refcount_t *r, unsigned int n)
+{
+ atomic_set(&r->refs, n);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int refcount_read(const refcount_t *r)
+{
+ return atomic_read(&r->refs);
+}
+
+static inline __must_check
+void refcount_add_not_zero(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
+{
+ unsigned int old, new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs);
+
+ for (;;) {
+ if (!val)
+ return false;
+
+ if (unlikely(val == UINT_MAX))
+ return true;
+
+ new = val + i;
+ if (new < val)
+ new = UINT_MAX;
+ old = atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&r->refs, val, new);
+ if (old == val)
+ break;
+
+ val = old;
+ }
+
+ WARN(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n");
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Similar to atomic_inc_not_zero(), will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN.
+ *
+ * Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller has guaranteed the
+ * object memory to be stable (RCU, etc.). It does provide a control dependency
+ * and thereby orders future stores. See the comment on top.
+ */
+static inline __must_check
+bool refcount_inc_not_zero(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ return refcount_add_not_zero(1, r);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Similar to atomic_inc(), will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN.
+ *
+ * Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller already has a
+ * reference on the object, will WARN when this is not so.
+ */
+static inline void refcount_inc(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ WARN(!refcount_inc_not_zero(r), "refcount_t: increment on 0; use-after-free.\n");
+}
+
+static inline void refcount_add(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
+{
+ WARN(!refcount_add_not_zero(i, r), "refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\n");
+}
+
+/*
+ * Similar to atomic_dec_and_test(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to
+ * decrement when saturated at UINT_MAX.
+ *
+ * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
+ * before, and provides a control dependency such that free() must come after.
+ * See the comment on top.
+ */
+static inline __must_check
+bool refcount_sub_and_test(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
+{
+ unsigned int old, new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs);
+
+ for (;;) {
+ if (val == UINT_MAX)
+ return false;
+
+ new = val - i;
+ if (WARN(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n"))
+ return false;
+
+ old = atomic_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, val, new);
+ if (old == val)
+ break;
+
+ val = old;
+ }
+
+ return !new;
+}
+
+static inline __must_check
+bool refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ return refcount_sub_and_test(1, r);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Similar to atomic_dec(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to decrement
+ * when saturated at UINT_MAX.
+ *
+ * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
+ * before.
+ */
+static inline
+void refcount_dec(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ WARN(refcount_dec_and_test(r), "refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.\n");
+}
+
+/*
+ * No atomic_t counterpart, it attempts a 1 -> 0 transition and returns the
+ * success thereof.
+ *
+ * Like all decrement operations, it provides release memory order and provides
+ * a control dependency.
+ *
+ * It can be used like a try-delete operator; this explicit case is provided
+ * and not cmpxchg in generic, because that would allow implementing unsafe
+ * operations.
+ */
+static inline __must_check
+bool refcount_dec_if_one(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ return atomic_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, 1, 0) == 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * No atomic_t counterpart, it decrements unless the value is 1, in which case
+ * it will return false.
+ *
+ * Was often done like: atomic_add_unless(&var, -1, 1)
+ */
+static inline __must_check
+bool refcount_dec_not_one(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ unsigned int old, new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs);
+
+ for (;;) {
+ if (val == UINT_MAX)
+ return true;
+
+ if (val == 1)
+ return false;
+
+ new = val - 1;
+ if (WARN(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n"))
+ return true;
+
+ old = atomic_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, val, new);
+ if (old == val)
+ break;
+
+ val = old;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Similar to atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(), it will WARN on underflow and fail
+ * to decrement when saturated at UINT_MAX.
+ *
+ * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
+ * before, and provides a control dependency such that free() must come after.
+ * See the comment on top.
+ */
+static inline __must_check
+bool refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(refcount_t *r, struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ if (refcount_dec_not_one(r))
+ return false;
+
+ mutex_lock(lock);
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) {
+ mutex_unlock(lock);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Similar to atomic_dec_and_lock(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to
+ * decrement when saturated at UINT_MAX.
+ *
+ * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
+ * before, and provides a control dependency such that free() must come after.
+ * See the comment on top.
+ */
+static inline __must_check
+bool refcount_dec_and_lock(refcount_t *r, spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ if (refcount_dec_not_one(r))
+ return false;
+
+ spin_lock(lock);
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) {
+ spin_unlock(lock);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+#endif /* _LINUX_REFCOUNT_H */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
