Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:37:18 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, David Windsor <dave@...gbits.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "Anvin, H Peter" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>, Julia.Lawall@...6.fr Subject: Re: Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 05:34:48PM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > I have a coccinelle rule now that found about 15 usages of it. Right, so can coccinelle detect the call_rcu/free call that is conditional on the dec_and_test when its hidden inside a few function calls? Also, we should really have a "make spatch" target so that we can run the thing concurrently with -j80 or somesuch, because as is coccinelle is unbearably slow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.