Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:51:23 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <>
To: Sargun Dhillon <>
Cc: LKML <>, Alexei Starovoitov <>,
        Andy Lutomirski <>,
        Daniel Borkmann
        Daniel Mack <>, David Drysdale <>,
        "David S . Miller"
        "Eric W . Biederman" <>,
        James Morris <>, Jann Horn <>,
        Kees Cook <>, Paul Moore <>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <>, Tejun Heo <>,
        Thomas Graf <>, Will Drewry <>,,
        Linux API <>,
        LSM <>,
        "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 00/18] Landlock LSM: Unprivileged sandboxing

On 14/11/2016 11:35, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> Was there a plan around getting Daniel's patches in as well? Also,
> rather than making these handles landlock-specific, can they be
> implemented in such a way where we can keep track of (some) of these
> in other types of programs?

About the map of handles, this is only a new type of map so it's not
particularly Landlock-specific. Anyway, we'll see that in the third step.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.