Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:51:02 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC v2 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC

>Done.  I added a line to the "HARDENED_ATOMIC Implementation" section of Documentation/security/hardened-atomic.txt describing the results of the benchmarks (no measurable performance difference).  You might want to add this line to the cover >letter as well.

Thank you David! I will merge it tomorrow before sending a new rfc. I will also add the performance line to cover letter. 

> I know I promised to post the results of another set of benchmarks I performed, and I will do that soon.

If you can send it before tomorrow, would be great! We can include them in v3 straight then. 
I would like to get v3 out tomorrow that people can look at it before the kernel summit. 

Best Regards,
Elena.

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Reshetova, Elena <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
>>> - add missing tests for atomic64 and local
>>> - rebase on top of latest linux-next
>>> - compile test and test run the whole thing in different 
>>> combinations
>>> - send rfcv3 with also all atomic maintainers included for wider 
>>> blame/feedback
>>>
>>> Does it sound like a good plan for everyone?
>>>
>
>> Actually, it doesn't look like I've updated Documentation/security/hardened-atomic.txt yet.  I need to fix the language explaining the x86 race condition to make it clear that we're discussing the SMP case.
>> I also want to add a sentence somewhere (either in your cover letter or in the kernel documentation, or both), referencing the benchmark results and lack of demonstrable performance degradation.
>
> David, could you please push the changes you want to do to the documentation in separate commit to the top of hardened_atomic_on_next?
>  I will cherry pick them to our new rebased branch hardened_atomic_next that we still working actively now.
>
> Best Regards,
> Elena.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.