|
|
Message-ID: <1477386248.2263.9.camel@cvidal.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:04:08 +0200
From: Colin Vidal <colin@...dal.org>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: keescook@...omium.org, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>, Elena
Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 13/13] lkdtm: add tests for
atomic over-/underflow
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 17:56 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 01:25:31PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> >
> > From: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
> >
> > This adds additional tests for modified atomic functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/misc/lkdtm.h | 17 +++++++
> > drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c | 17 +++++++
> > 3 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> > index cfa1039..224713a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> > @@ -20,7 +20,24 @@ void lkdtm_HARDLOCKUP(void);
> > void lkdtm_SPINLOCKUP(void);
> > void lkdtm_HUNG_TASK(void);
> > void lkdtm_ATOMIC_UNDERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_DEC_RETURN_UNDERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_SUB_UNDERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_SUB_RETURN_UNDERFLOW(void);
> > void lkdtm_ATOMIC_OVERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_INC_RETURN_OVERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_ADD_OVERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_ADD_RETURN_OVERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_ADD_UNLESS_OVERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_INC_AND_TEST_OVERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_UNDERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_DEC_RETURN_UNDERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_SUB_UNDERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_SUB_RETURN_UNDERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_OVERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_INC_RETURN_OVERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_ADD_OVERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_ADD_RETURN_OVERFLOW(void);
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_SUB_AND_TEST(void);
> > void lkdtm_CORRUPT_LIST_ADD(void);
> > void lkdtm_CORRUPT_LIST_DEL(void);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c
> > index f336206..bd79a88 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c
> > @@ -128,30 +128,116 @@ void lkdtm_HUNG_TASK(void)
> > schedule();
> > }
> >
> > -void lkdtm_ATOMIC_UNDERFLOW(void)
> > -{
> > - atomic_t under = ATOMIC_INIT(INT_MIN);
> > -
> > - pr_info("attempting good atomic increment\n");
> > - atomic_inc(&under);
> > - atomic_dec(&under);
> > -
> > - pr_info("attempting bad atomic underflow\n");
> > - atomic_dec(&under);
> > +#define ATOMIC_LKDTM_MIN(tag,fun) void lkdtm_ATOMIC_##tag(void) \
> > +{ \
> > + atomic_t atomic = ATOMIC_INIT(INT_MIN); \
> > + \
> > + pr_info("attempting good atomic_" #fun "\n"); \
> > + atomic_inc(&atomic); \
> > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \
> > + \
> > + pr_info("attempting bad atomic_" #fun "\n"); \
> > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \
> > }
> >
> > -void lkdtm_ATOMIC_OVERFLOW(void)
> > -{
> > - atomic_t over = ATOMIC_INIT(INT_MAX);
> > +#define ATOMIC_LKDTM_MAX(tag,fun,...) \
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_##tag(void) \
> > +{ \
> > + atomic_t atomic = ATOMIC_INIT(INT_MAX); \
> > + \
> > + pr_info("attempting good atomic_" #fun "\n"); \
> > + atomic_dec(&atomic); \
> > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \
> > + \
> > + pr_info("attempting bad atomic_" #fun "\n"); \
> > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \
> > +}
> >
> > - pr_info("attempting good atomic decrement\n");
> > - atomic_dec(&over);
> > - atomic_inc(&over);
> > +#define ATOMIC_LKDTM_LONG_MIN(tag,fun,...) \
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_##tag(void) \
> > +{ \
> > + atomic_long_t atomic = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(LONG_MIN); \
> > + \
> > + pr_info("attempting good atomic_long_" #fun "\n"); \
> > + atomic_long_inc(&atomic); \
> > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \
> > + \
> > + pr_info("attempting bad atomic_long_" #fun "\n"); \
> > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \
> > +}
> >
> > - pr_info("attempting bad atomic overflow\n");
> > - atomic_inc(&over);
> > +#define ATOMIC_LKDTM_LONG_MAX(tag,fun,...) \
> > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_##tag(void) \
> > +{ \
> > + atomic_long_t atomic = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(LONG_MAX); \
> > + \
> > + pr_info("attempting good atomic_long_" #fun "\n"); \
> > + atomic_long_dec(&atomic); \
> > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \
> > + \
> > + pr_info("attempting bad atomic_long_" #fun "\n"); \
> > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \
> > }
> >
> > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_dec(x)
> > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MIN(UNDERFLOW,dec)
> > +#undef TEST_FUNC
> > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_dec_return(x)
> > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MIN(DEC_RETURN_UNDERFLOW,dec_return);
> > +#undef TEST_FUNC
> > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_sub(1,x)
> > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MIN(SUB_UNDERFLOW,sub);
> > +#undef TEST_FUNC
> > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_sub_return(1,x);
> > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MIN(SUB_RETURN_UNDERFLOW,sub_return);
> > +#undef TEST_FUNC
> > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_inc(x);
> > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MAX(OVERFLOW,inc);
> > +#undef TEST_FUNC
> > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_inc_return(x);
> > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MAX(INC_RETURN_OVERFLOW,inc_return);
>
> Please note that this definition causes a compiler warning:
> /home/akashi/arm/armv8/linaro/linux-aarch64/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c: In function 'lkdtm_ATOMIC_INC_AND_TEST_OVERFLOW':
> /home/akashi/arm/armv8/linaro/linux-aarch64/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:222:55: warning: value computed is not used [-Wunused-value]
> #define atomic_inc_and_test(v) (atomic_inc_return(v) == 0)
> ^
> /home/akashi/arm/armv8/linaro/linux-aarch64/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c:204:22: note: in expansion of macro 'atomic_inc_and_test'
> #define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_inc_and_test(x);
>
There is the same issue with arm.
Thanks,
Colin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.