[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:12:36 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-metag@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: qemu:metag image runtime failure in -next due to 'kthread: allow
to cancel kthread work'
On Mon 2016-09-19 08:45:09, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:55:29PM +0100, James Hogan wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:32:49AM +0100, James Hogan wrote:
> > > Here this version of QEMU puts the args at where it thinks the end of
> > > the loaded image is, which is based on the number of bytes copied from
> > > the ELF, i.e. the total MemSiz's, not taking into account the alignment
> > > gap in between, so it puts them at 0x40377348.
> >
> > QEMU meta-v1.3.1 branch updated at:
> > https://github.com/img-meta/qemu.git
> >
> > Hopefully that'll fix it for you Guenter.
> >
> Confirmed fixed.
Could you please confirm that the boot problem has been fixed
on the qemu side? I guess that it is
https://github.com/img-meta/qemu/commit/0a2402860228198ae2729048f1de05aeedb7d642
Could Andrew enable all the kthread worker API improvements in -mm
tree again?
I think that kthread worker patch has been an innocent victim.
It added some functions that were not used anywhere. I think
that it has triggered the boot problem just by chance.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
