[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:25:00 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Hector Martin marcan <marcan@...can.st>
Cc: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] Add the latent_entropy gcc plugin
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Hector Martin "marcan"
<marcan@...can.st> wrote:
> Then there is the other side: is there are reason not to just make the
> plugin v2v3? That would certainly remove all doubt and potential issues,
> and complies with both GCC's license and the kernel's.
If that works, please take it up with the plugin authors. You and I
aren't going to convince each other, and I'm satisfied with the
licensing as it already is.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
