Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:25:00 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Hector Martin marcan <marcan@...can.st> Cc: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] Add the latent_entropy gcc plugin On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Hector Martin "marcan" <marcan@...can.st> wrote: > Then there is the other side: is there are reason not to just make the > plugin v2v3? That would certainly remove all doubt and potential issues, > and complies with both GCC's license and the kernel's. If that works, please take it up with the plugin authors. You and I aren't going to convince each other, and I'm satisfied with the licensing as it already is. -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.