Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 14:02:08 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, 
    Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, 
    Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
    "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, 
    Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, 
    Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, 
    David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>, 
    Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, 
    Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
    Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 2/2] mm: SLUB Freelist randomization

On Wed, 18 May 2016, Thomas Garnier wrote:

> Yes, I agree that it is not related to the changes.

Could you please provide meaningful test data?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.