[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 22:01:02 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>,
Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org>, Emrah Demir <ed@...sec.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, x86@...nel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kaslr: allow kASLR to be default over Hibernation
Hi!
> Since kASLR and Hibernation can not currently coexist at runtime
> on x86, the default behavior was to disable kASLR by default when
> CONFIG_HIBERNATION was present (to retain original behavior).
>
> The behavior of kASLR on arm64 (and soon MIPS) is to be enabled by
> default when selected at build time. Since arm64 Hibernation does not
> conflict with kASLR, this fixes the hibernation argument parsing to be
> x86-specific. Additionally, since end users want to be able to select
> kASLR on x86 by default at build time, create CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE_ON
> that is present only on x86.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
I believe this is bad idea. arm64 shows that kaslr and hibernation can
coexist, and hibernation is still useful when your battery runs out.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
