[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:41:47 -0600
From: David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Introduce GCC plugin infrastructure
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:27:52AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>Awesome! Thanks for testing this. I still need to finish getting my
>arm64 environment built...
I've been using:
http://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/
for most stuff.
>Do you happen to know if there's already a gcc bug open for the make
>install problem?
Linaro toolchain bug:
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2123
Patch to fix it
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00522.html
It is supposed to be included in the linaro 5.3-2016.03 snapshot.
I've pinged Christophe to see if I can get any insight into when that
will be available.
It is kind of nice to see that when it fails, it prints a helpful
message, though:
scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins:22: *** error, your gcc installation does not support plugins, perhaps the necessary headers are missing?. Stop.
I think it is OK to include this, even with the patches still bubbling
through gcc releases. It prints a helpful message when it doesn't
work, and is only going to be selected if specifically requested.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
