Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:57:11 +0100
From: Emese Revfy <>
To: Kees Cook <>
Cc: linux-kbuild <>, PaX Team
 <>, Brad Spengler <>,
 <>, Michal Marek <>,
 Rasmus Villemoes <>, Fengguang Wu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] GCC plugin infrastructure

On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:07:25 -0800
Kees Cook <> wrote:

> I wonder if it might make sense to split the .so-building logic
> changes from the gcc plugin changes to make things more readable for
> review? Personally, I'm fine with this as-is, but it might benefit
> other reviewers, if it's a sane split.

I will split this patch in the next patch set.

> > +M:     Kees Cook <>
> > +R:     Emese Revfy <>
> > +L:
> > +S:     Maintained
> > +F:     tools/gcc
> I think that needs a trailing slash to indicate it's a tree to match.

I tested it with and it is good.

> > +F:     Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt
> I wonder if this should be moved to Documentation/kbuild/ ?

I don't know. Michal Marek, could you please tell me where I should put the documentation? 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.