Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:00:23 +0100 From: "PaX Team" <pageexec@...email.hu> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata On 23 Feb 2016 at 12:53, Kees Cook wrote: > I prefer using all the "regular" mechanisms so that I really know I'm > exercising the actual case I want to be testing. (i.e. I don't want to > bypass the linker.) > > If only there were some way to filter gcc output, like with plugins. ;) plugins can set/override section flags, initify and constify both do in fact but i guess that's little help for your generic case that has to work without them as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.