Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:21:55 +0100 From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] GCC plugin infrastructure > > +ifeq ($(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0408, y), y) > > + $(CONFIG_SHELL) -x $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-plugin.sh "$(HOSTCXX)" "$(HOSTCXX)" "$(CC)" > > +else > > + $(CONFIG_SHELL) -x $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-plugin.sh "$(HOSTCC)" "$(HOSTCXX)" "$(CC)" > > Is there a reason for these to be running with -x? This makes it noisy > when running with V=0 (the default). I think -x is useful, it prints out e.g., which headers are missing. gcc-plugin.sh with -x runs only when there is something wrong (as you can see it in the kbuild test bot mails). -- Emese
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.