Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:21:55 +0100
From: Emese Revfy <>
To: Kees Cook <>
Cc: linux-kbuild <>, PaX Team
 <>, Brad Spengler <>,
 <>, Michal Marek <>,
 Rasmus Villemoes <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] GCC plugin infrastructure

> > +ifeq ($(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0408, y), y)
> > +       $(CONFIG_SHELL) -x $(srctree)/scripts/ "$(HOSTCXX)" "$(HOSTCXX)" "$(CC)"
> > +else
> > +       $(CONFIG_SHELL) -x $(srctree)/scripts/ "$(HOSTCC)" "$(HOSTCXX)" "$(CC)"
> Is there a reason for these to be running with -x? This makes it noisy
> when running with V=0 (the default).

I think -x is useful, it prints out e.g., which headers are missing. with -x runs
only when there is something wrong (as you can see it in the kbuild test bot mails).


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.