Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:26:46 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> To: Laura Abbott <laura@...bott.name> cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Sanitization of slabs based on grsecurity/PaX On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Laura Abbott wrote: > It's not the poisoning per se that's incompatible, it's how the poisoning is > set up. At least for slub, the current poisoning is part of SLUB_DEBUG which > enables other consistency checks on the allocator. Trying to pull out just > the poisoning for use when SLUB_DEBUG isn't on would result in roughly what > would be here anyway. I looked at trying to reuse some of the existing > poisoning > and came to the conclusion it was less intrusive to the allocator to keep it > separate. SLUB_DEBUG does *not* enable any debugging features. It builds the logic for debugging into the kernel but does not activate it. CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is set for production kernels. The poisoning is build in by default into any recent linux kernel out there. You can enable poisoning selectively (and no other debug feature) by specifying slub_debug=P on the Linux kernel command line right now. There is a SLAB_POISON flag for each kmem_cache that can be set to *only* enable poisoning and nothing else from code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.