[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 00:34:07 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: mm: flip priority of CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:11:22PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> [151223 13:45]:
> > We fixed a bunch of similar issues where code was located in the .data
> > section for ease of use from assembly code. See commit b4e61537 and
> > d0776aff for example.
>
> Thanks hey some assembly fun for the holidays :) I also need to check what
> all gets relocated to SRAM here.
>
> In any case, seems like the $subject patch is too intrusive for v4.5 at
> this point.
Given Christmas and an unknown time between that and the merge window
actually opening, I decided Tuesday would be the last day I take any
patches into my tree - and today would be the day that I drop anything
that causes problems.
So, I've already dropped this, so tomorrow's linux-next should not have
this change.
You'll still see breakage if people enable RODATA though, but that's no
different from previous kernels.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
