[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 21:26:09 +0100
From: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: tixxdz@...il.com,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] procfs: protect /proc/<pid>/* files with file->f_cred
/proc/<pid>/* entries varies at runtime, appropriate permission checks
need to happen during each system call.
Currently some of these sensitive entries are protected by performing
the ptrace_may_access() check. However even with that the /proc file
descriptors can be passed to a more privileged process
(e.g. a suid-exec) which will pass the classic ptrace_may_access()
check. In general the ->open() call will be issued by an unprivileged
process while the ->read(),->write() calls by a more privileged one.
Example of these files are:
/proc/*/syscall, /proc/*/stack etc.
And any open(/proc/self/*) then suid-exec to read()/write() /proc/self/*
These files are protected during read() by the ptrace_may_access(),
however the file descriptor can be passed to a suid-exec which can be
used to read data and bypass ASLR. Of course this was discussed several
times on LKML.
Solution:
Here we propose a clean solution that uses available mechanisms. No
additions, nor new structs/memory allocation...
After a discussion about some /proc/<pid>/* file permissions [1],
Eric W. Biederman proposed to use the file->f_cred to check if current's
cred have changed [2], actually he said that Linus was looking
on using the file->f_cred to implement a similar thing! But run in
problems with Chromes sandbox ? a link please ?
So here are my experiments:
The idea is to track the cred of current. If the cred change between
->open() and read()/write() this means that current has lost or gained
some X privileges. If so, in addition to the classic ptrace_may_access()
check, perform a second check using the file's opener cred. This means,
if an unprivileged process that tries to use a privileged one
(e.g. suid-exec) to read privileged files will get caught. The original
process that opened the file does not have the appropriate permissions
to read()/write() the target /proc/<pid>/* entry.
This second check is done of course during read(),write()...
Advantages of the proposed solution:
* It uses available mechanisms: file->f_cred which is a const cred
that reference the cred of the opener.
* The file->f_cred can be easily referenced
* It allows to pass file descriptors under certain conditions:
(1) current at open time may have enough permissions
(2) current does a suid-exec or change its ruid/euid (new cred)
(3) current or suid-exec tries to read from the task /proc entry
Allow the ->read() only if the file's opener cred at (1)
have enough permissions on *this* task /proc entry during
*this* ->read() moment. Otherwise fail.
IOW allow it, if the opener does not need the help of a suid-exec to
read/write data.
Disadvantage:
* Currently only /proc/*/{stack,syscall,stat,personality} are handled.
If the solution is accepted I'll continue with other files, taking
care to not break userspace. All the facilities are provided.
* Your feedback
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/26/354
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/31/209
Change log
----------
v1->v2:
- Removed the file->f_cred member that was added to seq_file struct.
Al Viro didn't like it, and Linus suggested to have a pointer on
'file struct', so it's done by using seq_file->private
- Added Acked-by: Kees Cook to
[PATCH v2 4/9] procfs: make /proc/*/{stack,syscall} 0400
- Added suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman to
[PATCH v2 1/9] procfs: add proc_same_open_cred() to check if the cred
have changed
[PATCH v2 2/9] procfs: add proc_allow_access() to check if file's
opener may access task
[PATCH v2 3/9] procfs: Document the proposed solution to protect
procfs entries
- Patchset cleaned
Version 1 was discussed here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/25/459
The following series tries to implement what I describe.
Djalal Harouni (9):
procfs: add proc_same_open_cred() to check if the cred have changed
procfs: add proc_allow_access() to check if file's opener may access task
procfs: Document the proposed solution to protect procfs entries
procfs: make /proc/*/{stack,syscall} 0400
procfs: make /proc entries that use seq files able to access file->f_cred
procfs: add permission checks on the file's opener of /proc/*/stat
procfs: add permission checks on the file's opener of /proc/*/personality
procfs: improve permission checks on /proc/*/stack
procfs: improve permission checks on /proc/*/syscall
fs/proc/array.c | 16 ++++++-
fs/proc/base.c | 301 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
fs/proc/internal.h | 3 ++
3 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
