[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:25:12 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] exec: add a global execve counter
On 03/11, Djalal Harouni wrote:
>
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1420,6 +1420,9 @@ struct task_struct {
> #endif
> seccomp_t seccomp;
>
> +/* Execve counter: will be used to check if objects belong to the appropriate
> + * process image */
> + atomic64_t exec_id;
> /* Thread group tracking */
> u32 parent_exec_id;
> u32 self_exec_id;
Well, I don't think it is right to add this counter into task_struct.
It should be per-process, signal_struct makes more sense. Or may be
mm_struct.
Btw this is also true for parent_exec_id/self_exec_id, but this is
another story.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
