Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:42:56 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <>
Subject: Re: 32/64 bitness restriction for pid namespace


On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 14:34 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:38:36PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > Given the latest discussion on LKML we're unlikely to push the
> > restriction upstream.  So, I'm posting the patch here.
> I feel that it may be desirable to post the patch to LKML as well - not
> as RFC, nor PATCH anymore, but merely for the sake of completeness.  We
> promised a better patch, so we should provide it, even if we know it's
> NAK'ed.  Just word your message such that no one gets the impression
> we're pushing this regardless of it having been NAK'ed.  Mention
> explicitly that given the discussion so far you do not expect this to be
> applied, but you are posting this for the sake of completeness - to have
> this proposal archived in full, including the actual patch.
> Does this make sense to you?

Just sent it with minor corrections to be compilable on non-x86.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.