Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:42:56 +0400 From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: 32/64 bitness restriction for pid namespace Solar, On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 14:34 +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:38:36PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > > Given the latest discussion on LKML we're unlikely to push the > > restriction upstream. So, I'm posting the patch here. > > I feel that it may be desirable to post the patch to LKML as well - not > as RFC, nor PATCH anymore, but merely for the sake of completeness. We > promised a better patch, so we should provide it, even if we know it's > NAK'ed. Just word your message such that no one gets the impression > we're pushing this regardless of it having been NAK'ed. Mention > explicitly that given the discussion so far you do not expect this to be > applied, but you are posting this for the sake of completeness - to have > this proposal archived in full, including the actual patch. > > Does this make sense to you? Just sent it with minor corrections to be compilable on non-x86. Thanks, -- Vasiliy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.