Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 03:18:07 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org> Cc: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: restrict pid namespaces to 32 or 64 bit syscalls On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 06:13:51PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > > > So how do we proceed from here? Start by getting Will's patch applied? > > How to move forward with Will's patch is supposed to be discussed at > the invite only kernel summit October 23 - 25, 2011. As one of the linux-kernel is really the primary forum. If you want to discuss something just discuss it here (ideally with patches) May the best patch win. -Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.