[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 03:18:07 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
Cc: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: restrict pid namespaces to 32 or 64 bit syscalls
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 06:13:51PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
>
> > So how do we proceed from here? Start by getting Will's patch applied?
>
> How to move forward with Will's patch is supposed to be discussed at
> the invite only kernel summit October 23 - 25, 2011. As one of the
linux-kernel is really the primary forum. If you want to discuss
something just discuss it here (ideally with patches)
May the best patch win.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
