Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:58:15 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <>
To: Will Drewry <>
Cc:, "H. Peter Anvin" <>,
	Andi Kleen <>,
	Solar Designer <>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>, James Morris <>,,,
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] x86: restrict pid namespaces to 32 or 64 bit syscalls

> Perhaps :) I wish it had landed after 9 revisions and at least two
> variant patches. Despite that, I think it's great to pull in
> additional requirements, like COMPAT locking, to make sure that the
> solution is really a good one.  It may also be that my entire original
> approach was wrong and should be revisited too.  Everyone's comments
> here and the proposed patch itself certainly have me thinking.

I didn't see anything wrong with it. Also the first try doesn't 
need to be perfect anyways, it can be always changed later.
How about you just repost it?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.