Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:58:15 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] x86: restrict pid namespaces to 32 or 64 bit syscalls > Perhaps :) I wish it had landed after 9 revisions and at least two > variant patches. Despite that, I think it's great to pull in > additional requirements, like COMPAT locking, to make sure that the > solution is really a good one. It may also be that my entire original > approach was wrong and should be revisited too. Everyone's comments > here and the proposed patch itself certainly have me thinking. I didn't see anything wrong with it. Also the first try doesn't need to be perfect anyways, it can be always changed later. How about you just repost it? -Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.