Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 23:25:30 +0400
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: 32/64 bitness restriction for pid namespace

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:31:18PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> Also, to keep the code clean and small, I think sysctl interface should
> be dropped.  The only use case is locking a live container, which is
> probably a very limited thing.  Also it will fail if any unprivileged task
> already runs a binary of other bitness anyway.
> Do you agree?


BTW, another user of this feature may be vsftpd - but I guess it will
simply be enhanced to use our prctl().


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.