[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwQKqvNvzTMYXVW_yKkFtNsyv8uuBiWiwYLof-nPqPu9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:46:18 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move RLIMIT_NPROC check from set_user() to do_execve_common()
It sounds like people are effectively Ack'ing the patch, but with this
kind of patch I don't want to add the "implicit Ack" that I often do
for regular stuff.
So could people who think that the patch is ok in its current form
just send me their acked-by or reviewed-by? I haven't heard any actual
objection to it, and I think it's valid for the current -rc.
Alternatively, feel free to send a comment like "I think it's the
right thing, but maybe it should wait for the next merge window"..
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
