Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 00:21:12 -0300 From: Rodrigo s <rodrigozanattasilva@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: John the Ripper in the cloud update 2023/02 Hi Alexander. Really thanks for your help! I am really happy to say that it works now. All I did was exactly what that link said <https://towardsthecloud.com/amazon-ec2-requested-more-vcpu-capacity> to do. I put a random number like 80. After a day the AWS accepted. Summary of service quota(s) requested for increase: [US East (Northern Virginia)]: EC2 Instances / nu.general (All Standard (A, C, D, H, I, M, R, T, Z) instances), New Limit = 80 Now... I can't say if it was what you did to solve the problem. But, after I try again, using the same default configuration, it works without any problem and I have the Linux console. I can learn more and understand how all of it works. But I am a little disappointed. I thought it could be extremely faster than what I can do myself on my computer. In my test (trying a random format I was using), it was doing about 12.555KC/s in each thread, so 12,5k *2 = 25KC/S. In my computer the same operation make 4,3KC/s in 12 threads or about 50KC/S Because we can easily "build" a new computer in AWS, I thought this bundle could have the best possible configuration. What really makes the program work faster? I always have this question in my mind. So, with AWS I could test it. What do you think about it? Is there a cheap configuration in AWS? Or to it work, I just need to pay for the most expensive options in AWS? There is no shortcut for it? I really would like to help with this AWS project. Because I am still a noob, I can just think about how to do it. But I can study if you say that what I show makes sense :) Em seg., 6 de mar. de 2023 às 21:59, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> escreveu: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 01:55:40AM +0100, Solar Designer wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 01:10:23AM +0100, Solar Designer wrote: > > > I'll also consider changing the default instance type for this product, > > > perhaps to c6i.large, which should barely fit the defaults as far as I > > > can see. I'd appreciate it if you test and confirm or disprove that. > > > > Actually, looks like c6i.2xlarge should also fit the defaults - can you > > test that one? > > Oops, I meant c6i.xlarge without the "2" in there. Sorry. As far as I > see, it's up to 5 vCPUs on those instance types by default, and xlarge > means 4 vCPUs, so should fit. > > Alexander >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.