Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 06:08:53 -0500 From: Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@...il.com> To: john-users <john-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Hyperscan regex 42x the performance of pcre On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 06:04, Jason Ellison <infotek@...il.com> wrote: > > List, > > After reading performance comparisons of various regex engines... hscan > performs 42 times faster than pcre. I'm curious as to possible performance > benefits of including Hyperscan into john. > > https://rust-leipzig.github.io/regex/2017/03/28/comparison-of-regex-engines/ > > https://www.hyperscan.io/ > https://github.com/intel/hyperscan > > Is John sitting a long time in pcre? I mean if you are spending 80 seconds making hashes and 1 second to regex and you cut it down to 0.1 second.. does it help any? > Regards, > > Jason Ellison -- Stephen J Smoogen.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.