Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 23:41:44 -0400 From: Chris Bonk <bonk.chris@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Cc: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> Subject: Re: Using PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 Chiming back in. I solved the issue. I made the mistake of base64 encoding literally the hex string. @jfoug is correct. I needed to modify the derivation and salt to be encoding to base64 from binary. I ended up using hashcat, which is currently running. I hope this helps anyone else if they encounter similar issues. CB On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 at 23:16 jfoug <jfoug@...nwall.net> wrote: > On 6/9/2018 6:40 PM, magnum wrote: > > That's valid data for sure, but it's 44 bytes and that hash doesn't > > load - I have no idea why. I believe JimF wrote the current > > incarnation of the format. > AFAIK, the input string was an ITW format, and thus processed as it is. > I was provided the input hashes, and wrote the format to use them. Why > they are the way they are, I can not say for sure. >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.