Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:17:35 -0700 From: B B <dustythepath@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Any differences between Openwall.com versions and Github: dmg2john? > On Jun 22, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 08:01:27AM -0700, B B wrote: >> So it occurs to me after getting my hash using the jumbo version on Openwall.com <http://openwall.com/> > > "the jumbo version on Openwall.com" doesn't mean anything specific to > me. What jumbo version are you referring to? > A correction: I was referring to JohnTheRipper-bleeding-jumbo >> to get my dmg hash that the hash may be invalid with the latest changes to the format in Mac OS X Sierra. > > I think not. I've just checked, and there haven't been significant > changes to dmg2john.c since 2014 (which is when 1.8.0-jumbo-1, which you > might have used, was released). > I went ahead and compared my hash from the jumbo version to the bleeding-jumbo version. They were the same, so as you stated dmg2john is up to date in both. >> My question is: Is the version on the website updated for the Sierra dmg format? > > I think it doesn't need to be, or if it does then the latest hasn't been > updated either. > >> > > Regardless, ideally you'd generate a test .dmg file on Sierra and make > sure you're able to crack its known password. > I tested a newly created sparsebundle hash and the job completed successfully. Thanks again > Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.