Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 01:31:04 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Splitting workload on multiple hosts On 2014-08-04 16:44, Rich Rumble wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 5:50 AM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: >> Basically the syntax for MPI with --node is the same as for --fork with >> --node. So these two examples are equivalent in terms of work space: >> >> ./john -fork=16 -node=1-16/10000 (...) >> >> mpirun -host=alpha,bravo -np 16 ./john -node=1-16/10000 (...) >> > Since Fork is no good for Windows and i currently want to dumbforce > something. I don't have network connectivity to most of the hosts I'm > pooling, so I may have to go and use live CD's and use Fork after all, but > in linux. I am using node like the example, but I'm not sure it will work > on external modes as well as fork would. The key space distribution is 100% identical whether you use fork, MPI or just manual instances of --node. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.