Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:07:41 +0000 From: Nicolas Brulez <nicolas.Brulez@...persky.com> To: "john-users@...ts.openwall.com" <john-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: RAR Cracking with JtR Jumbo (Files found during forensics) Thanks Rich! This leads to the second n00b question :) using john.exe or the omp version, i get the same speed. I should be able to run more threads on this cpu, is there something to change in order to get Multi core support? I guess i will RTFM some more. Nico -- Best regards, Nicolas Brulez | Malware Expert - Global Research and Analysis Team | Kaspersky Lab -----Message d'origine----- De : Rich Rumble [mailto:richrumble@...il.com] Envoyé : mercredi 13 février 2013 17:53 À : john-users@...ts.openwall.com Objet : Re: [john-users] RAR Cracking with JtR Jumbo (Files found during forensics) On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > Not necessarily. Is your 1200 c/s based on crark's reporting while > cracking one of these RARs, or on a separate benchmark run? > > Who knows, we may be lucky ;) > Have you already tested the entire RockYou list (~14M uniques) without > rules? > I'm getting 150-160 c/s on 8 threads(omp) using a Cwgwin\win32 build (Intel Xeon E5620@...0GHz) c:\john-1.7.9-jumbo-7\run>john-omp.exe brulez.txt -format=rar -pot=rar.pot -w=rockyou.txt Loaded 3 password hashes with 3 different salts (RAR3 SHA-1 AES [32/32]) guesses: 0 time: 0:00:00:02 0.00% c/s: 150 trying: carolina - david guesses: 0 time: 0:00:00:04 0.00% c/s: 151 trying: alyssa - horses I've got more resources to throw around, but if the nature of the password is unknown, at these speeds I don't know if it will help. -rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.