Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 20:58:06 -0500 From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: generating passwords candidates longer than 8 characters using incremental attack On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:40 PM, <jfoug@....net> wrote: >> again. Thus, that test compile says nothing about whether MinGW make >> target worked in JtR -jumbo at the time or not. ;-) I had/have openssl, I need to check again nonetheless. > I just posted numerous patches to magnum, to get mingw to partly compile. I needed to get it building again, to get the md?-mmx.o, the x86.o and other asm stuff, so that my visual C was back up to date. VC can not build the asm, and the only build that properly builds in the VC 'marshalling' code for the mmx asm, is mingw. However, mine still has problems, and will not link right. > > NOTE, there are a few new non-hash formats that have issues in non linux system. But with some of the recent changes, mingw should be 'close' to working. It may require a plug format or 2 to be removed from the build dir, but it should not be too hard to build. > > I pretty much gave up with mingw building, about 18 months ago, and now simply use cygwin. thus I have not kept my mingw up to date. It very well may be that an up to date mingw would work just fine. What do I need to do to add OMP to mingw when and if I can get it to build tomorrow when I try again. Is it just OpenMP and uncomment the line(s) in the makefile? -rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.