Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:28:51 +0400 From: Aleksey Cherepanov <aleksey.4erepanov@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: make install On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:52:24AM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > For Johnny (as it is), implementing "make install" should be trivial. > > Yes, yes it is. I just could not stop my jaw from dropping when it said > "make install not tested". I kept thinking "then why on earth did you > bother to write a "make install". Personally I like to test the things > I write (and release). I agree that it looks weird from the side. I did not write Makefile. It is generated by qmake from project file (that does not contain any specific definitions) and I did not look into that to check what's going on there (it is postponed till next release). So I wrote "'make install' was not tested" to not confuse users with stuff that I did not write and/or test. It is on my todo list for next release. So I'll test it for Johnny 1.2 (along with things for packaging). Thanks! -- Regards, Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.