Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:03:10 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: john-1.7.9-jumbo-6 Solaris x86 build uploaded to the custom builds page--I forgot to update to the wiki page On 2012-08-08 03:48, Robert B. Harris wrote: > In my experience, Solaris is the hardest to statically link. > > Making sure one has all the static libraries is a pain. > > I'm planning on making a static build of libomp and librt, if that is even > possible on Solaris. This recent build doesn't have static rt. > > Are you looking to have a Solaris-omp-static build or something? Well, if you routinely need to edit the Makefile for the static builds, we might try to create such target instead. If at all possible. magnum > > -----Original Message----- > From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 4:39 PM > To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com > Subject: Re: [john-users] john-1.7.9-jumbo-6 Solaris x86 build uploaded to > the custom builds page--I forgot to update to the wiki page > > On 2012-08-07 22:33, Robert B. Harris wrote: >> This version is statically linked to OpenSSL v1.0.1c >> >> Compiled with gcc v4.6.1 > > Robert, > > Is static linking a walk in the park nowadays, or do you have some special > tweaks you need to apply each time? Bottom line: is there anything we > could/should change in the main tree? > > magnum > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.