Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 12:05:04 -0400 From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: automation equipped working place of hash cracker, proposal On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:55 AM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: > I have half-heartedly maintained a private copy of the --fork and --node > code, unified with the MPI code and with current git updates. It's not > 100% complete but the idea was that a session started with --fork=4 > would produce .rec files that are identical to ones produced with > mpiexec -np 4, so you could start a session using --fork and resume it > under MPI, or vice versa. > > I'd like to finish that and release it but I don't have the inspiration: > The problem is not so much writing the final pieces of code, as it is > testing it :-/ I have linux and windows machines available, but other than compiling and testing it against hashes on those two types of systems I doubt I'd be of much help. -rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.