Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:40:18 +0100
From: Javier González del Tánago Liberal
Subject: Re: Best performance MPI vs OMP

On 02/03/12 12:14, Javier González del Tánago Liberal wrote:
> On 01/03/12 22:37, Solar Designer wrote:
>> Please also post the corresponding MPI benchmarks in here, or maybe 
>> add a third table to the wiki. The benchmark results you posted so 
>> far are probably those relevant to your intended use, which is just 
>> right, but for the wiki we need info on specific hash types. Thanks, 
>> Alexander
> Thanks for your help,
> I will do more test changing the OMP parameters and I will publish 
> them as soon as I can.
These are the results:

DES (many/one salt)
     - MPI: 54410K/51601K
     - OMP: 47087K/21626K

     - MPI: 786762K
     - OMP: 50823K (1)

     - MPI: 533520K
     - OMP: 18498K (2)

NETLM (many/one salt)
     - MPI: 53168K/17572K
     - OMP: 27787K/865569 (1)

NETNTLM (many/one salt)
     - MPI: 53268K/39016K
     - OMP: 30736K/7077

(2) Same result with OMP_NUM_THREADS={24,48}

I did real test and these are the results:

Crack LM Hash of "ex&31"
     - MPI: 1m
     - OMP: 29m

Crack LM Hash of "ex&314"
     - MPI: 1m
     - OMP: 55m

Crack LM Hash of "gol27$"
     - MPI: 27sec
     - OMP: 11m

With NT Hash the results are quite similar, there is a big difference 
between MPI and OMP.
I will publish the results on the wiki.

Javier González del Tánago Liberal
CriptoLab. Despacho 6305.
Facultad de Informática.
Campus de Montegancedo S/N
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Boadilla del Monte. Madrid (Spain)

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (2912 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.