[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKtfLcvyqxkdTA0TK68fjmay3BF3-NG=wm6-r4_Te4NJenT7TA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:46:22 -0800
From: Alain Espinosa <alainesp@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OMP version not use all CPU
On 2/15/12, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> What c/s rates are you getting for these tests, though? I am interested
> in both --test and actual runs.
Option --test was tested on the same Core i3 machine mentioned in
"http://hashsuite.openwall.net/performance". I give a try to NT2
format also ("real" and --test), and found it a very little speed-up
compared with NT. I assume that using 64 bits john will be different.
Some numbers for 1,10,100...(same as webpage) hashes:
John-1.7.9-j5[nt2] 19.41 18.9538 18.51 16.544 16.5446 12.019226 11.16 5.122
I will add all those numbers to the performance webpage mentioned earlier.
saludos,
alain
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
