Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:08:53 -0600
From: "jfoug" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: restoration and different date

Note, the last time ETA was shown was at 0.13% with a speed of 3100k or so.
Then the next ETA was at 0.20% and the speed had risen to 3400k.  Thus, the
reduction in ETA date is very valid.


>From: magnum []
>2011-12-07 19:54, wrote:
>> I have restored a session
>> Check the date between "( )". That should be the same, no ?
>> iMac-de-xxx-xx:run xxxxxx$ mpirun -np 4 ./john -restore=NTLM
>> Loaded 1 password hash (NT MD4 [128/128 X2 SSE2-16])
>> MPI: each node loaded 1/4 of wordfile to memory (about 23 KB/node)
>>   1: guesses: 0 time: 0:00:30:13 c/s: 3405K trying: 97air002abri959 -
>>   0: guesses: 0 time: 0:00:30:13 0.20% (ETA: Sun Dec 18 07:07:59 2011)
>c/s: 3413K trying: 02note003son522 - 02fine003peu522
>In some cases it's normal for them to drift apart. In this case I think
>it's just because the percentage is still so low, so the ETA is a very
>rough figure. I bet they will be much closer to each other at 1% or
>By the way your c/s rates are very low. They should be 10 times this
>speed on a decent CPU. Maybe you are you over-booking your CPU's.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.