Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:08:53 -0600 From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net> To: <john-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: restoration and different date Note, the last time ETA was shown was at 0.13% with a speed of 3100k or so. Then the next ETA was at 0.20% and the speed had risen to 3400k. Thus, the reduction in ETA date is very valid. Jim. >From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com] >2011-12-07 19:54, websiteaccess@...il.com wrote: >> I have restored a session >> >> Check the date between "( )". That should be the same, no ? >> >> iMac-de-xxx-xx:run xxxxxx$ mpirun -np 4 ./john -restore=NTLM >> Loaded 1 password hash (NT MD4 [128/128 X2 SSE2-16]) >> MPI: each node loaded 1/4 of wordfile to memory (about 23 KB/node) >> 1: guesses: 0 time: 0:00:30:13 c/s: 3405K trying: 97air002abri959 - >97vol002aide959 >> 0: guesses: 0 time: 0:00:30:13 0.20% (ETA: Sun Dec 18 07:07:59 2011) >c/s: 3413K trying: 02note003son522 - 02fine003peu522 > >In some cases it's normal for them to drift apart. In this case I think >it's just because the percentage is still so low, so the ETA is a very >rough figure. I bet they will be much closer to each other at 1% or >more. > >By the way your c/s rates are very low. They should be 10 times this >speed on a decent CPU. Maybe you are you over-booking your CPU's.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.