[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:03:48 -0500 (EST)
From: "Brad Tilley" <brad@...ystems.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: AMD X6 multicore issue
I have one of these CPUs (AMD x6 1090T). I'd be glad to test if that would
be helpful. Let me know.
Brad
> My comments are inline:
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 06:59:09PM +0200, Caesarmv wrote:
>> * c@cd:~/pass/john-1.7.8-jumbo-8/run$ mpiexec -np 6 ./john
>> ../../pass.txt*
>>
>> Loaded 2 password hashes with 2 different salts (generic crypt(3)
>> [?/64])
>> Loaded 2 password hashes with 2 different salts (generic crypt(3)
>> [?/64])
>> Remaining 1 password hash
>> Loaded 2 password hashes with 2 different salts (generic crypt(3)
>> [?/64])
>> Remaining 1 password hash
>> Remaining 1 password hash
>> Node 0@cd: Crash recovery file is locked: ./john.rec
>> Node 0@cd: Crash recovery file is locked: ./john.rec
>> Loaded 2 password hashes with 2 different salts (generic crypt(3)
>> [?/64])
>> Node 0@cd: Crash recovery file is locked: ./john.rec
>> Remaining 1 password hash
>> Loaded 2 password hashes with 2 different salts (generic crypt(3)
>> [?/64])
>> Remaining 1 password hash
>> Loaded 2 password hashes with 2 different salts (generic crypt(3)
>> [?/64])
>> Remaining 1 password hash
>
> Looks like you're running mpiexec on a non-MPI build. Maybe you did not
> enable MPI in the Makefile, or maybe you forgot to do a "make clean"
> between different builds.
>
>> *c@cd:~/pass/john-1.7.8-jumbo-8/run$ mpiexec -np 6 ./john --test*
>>
>> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-512 [64/64]... DONE
>> Raw: 1235K c/s real, 1235K c/s virtual
>>
>> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-512 [64/64]... DONE
>> Raw: 1216K c/s real, 1228K c/s virtual
>>
>> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-512 [64/64]... DONE
>> Raw: 1213K c/s real, 1237K c/s virtual
>>
>> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-512 [64/64]... DONE
>> Raw: 1194K c/s real, 1231K c/s virtual
>>
>> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-512 [64/64]... DONE
>> Raw: 1186K c/s real, 1235K c/s virtual
>>
>> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-512 [64/64]... DONE
>> Raw: 1786K c/s real, 1804K c/s virtual
>
> This is similarly wrong. With an MPI-enabled build, you'd get just one
> benchmark per hash type. (Ditto for OpenMP.)
>
>> > Compilation type is *make linux-x86-64.*
>> >
>> > Did you enable MPI or/and OpenMP in the Makefile?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> What exactly did you do?
>
>> I'm interested in *SHA512* (ubuntu default pass file).
>
> You're confused here. crypt(3) based on SHA-512 is one thing (slow),
> raw SHA-512 is another (fast). You need the former.
>
> Anyway, John includes not only MPI, but also OpenMP support in its
> "generic crypt(3)" module (which is what you should be using for this
> hash type currently). So my advice is that you don't bother with MPI
> (which is a jumbo-specific feature, and which you somehow misconfigured)
> and instead enable OpenMP in the Makefile (should be easier to do and
> use). You may use a clean 1.7.9 tree (no need for -jumbo for your hash
> type). Please don't forget to "make clean" before making a new build.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
