Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:27:16 -0400
From: Nigel Sollars <nsollars@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Linux MIPS

Ah,

That makes perfect sense,  Il take the full patch route.

Nige

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 06:05:15AM -0400, Nigel Sollars wrote:
> > I tried applying that one to the latest jumbo source tarball,  and it
> > pretty much gets rejected.  Is there a pre-requisit patch required before
> > attempting to apply this one?
>
> Formally, yes - all lower-numbered post-jumbo-7 patches (0001 to 0035)
> are meant to be applied first.  However, you can bypass this by applying
> this specific patch to md5_gen_fmt.c instead of to dynamic_fmt.c (a
> rename made with one of the lower-numbered patches).
>
> $ patch src/md5_gen_fmt.c < 0036-j7-dynamic-be-x1-fixes.diff
> patching file src/md5_gen_fmt.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 350 (offset -3 lines).
>
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:55 PM, jfoug <jfoug@....net> wrote:
> >
> > > Patch 0036 on the wiki, should fix the compile issues for BigEndian
> systems
> > > that are 1x md5 (the 2x was working already).
>
> Alexander
>



-- 
“Science is a differential equation. Religion is a boundary condition.”

Alan Turing

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.