Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:21:59 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Contribution licensing On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:28:57AM -0600, RB wrote: > Specifically, on my MPI work (what little rearrangement I've done), > there seems to be no original explicit license by Ryan Lim. [...] > In all honesty I'd rather just grant a completely liberal license on > this particular work to Openwall/Solar and let them re-license as they > see fit. Unfortunately, it's still technically a derivative work > (even though it bears almost no resemblance to the original), so in > absence of a prior license I don't think I have the right to do so. I think it makes sense to try approaching Ryan Lim about this. Point him at http://openwall.info/wiki/john/licensing and at this posting, and try to get him to publish his code with a proper statement - or at least to make a public statement as it relates to his code (he'd need to be specific). Failing that, you could look at just how much of Ryan's code you have left in the patch - maybe whatever you might have left is too minor to be subject to copyright. Thanks, Alexander -- To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.