Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:02:45 -0500 From: "Jim" <jfoug@....net> To: <john-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: patch for new john format: phpass (also works for phpBBv3) Thank you. I will use that approach. This time I made a *-2.diff based upon 'clean' base, and made a *-2upd.diff which works if the *-1.diff had been applied. In the future, I will simply do -REVS.diff based upon a 'clean' -0 state. Jim. -----Original Message----- From: RB [mailto:aoz.syn@...il.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 3:37 PM To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [john-users] patch for new john format: phpass (also works for phpBBv3) [...] Generally speaking, OSS patches are produced against the base [original] source with no prior assumptions unless released as a bisectable series: PATCH 0/3: explanation PATCH 1/3: standalone changes PATCH 2/3: changes dependent on 1/3 PATCH 3/3: changes dependent on 2/3 So, assuming -1 hasn't been applied is a more accepted approach. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.