Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:10:08 +0200 From: Simon Marechal <simon@...quise.net> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: jumbo patch for 220.127.116.11 Solar Designer a écrit : > I know there's still plenty of stuff to consider and maybe merge from > Simon Marechal's "myjohn". Simon - would you be so kind to submit it as > patches against 18.104.22.168-all-2 (or whatever will be latest at the time)? > > When submitting patches, please pay attention to these guidelines: > > http://openwall.info/wiki/how-to-make-patches The reason why i keep "my" tree public is that it's too tedious to produce clean patches, due to all the specific tweaks only I use. However, if you only want specific parts I could produce a proper patch. Currently, here are the differences between my stuff and the jumbo patch I know of: * probably less stable * less ciphers supported, only tested with x86, x64 linux * markov-chains based password generator, and associated utilities * usage of the SSE functions when they are available * a shortcut for the netlm cipher (part of the original LM hash could be bruteforced. It could be possible to crack it almost as fast as the original LM hash) * an optimized "old lotus" implementation for x86 * some tweaks which i find useful, such as printing the lines that have not been found when doing -show I believe that the most useful thing that I have and that is not part of the jumbo patch is the markov generator, which is more effective than -inc (for my usage, and especially for slow ciphers) and let you manually but easily distribute work. So, what would you consider worth inclusion ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.