Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:13:38 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: NTLM patch performance On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 10:32:53AM -0800, Alain Espinosa wrote: > In fact i make some improve in the NT patch (witch C code) that benchmark > 5100K. > I send this code to Simon. This means that sse2 code its 4 times > slower that C code and dont help much. Sorry, I don't understand you here - maybe the witch is at fault. ;-) > one sse2 intruction > one mmx instruction > ............................... > and we can compute 6 words in parallel. Yes, feel free to give this a try. Mixing in some x86-64 ALU instructions might help improve performance on some processors, too. -- Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com> GPG key ID: 5B341F15 fp: B3FB 63F4 D7A3 BCCC 6F6E FC55 A2FC 027C 5B34 1F15 http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments -- To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.