Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 00:56:14 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Optimized for Cell BE On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:26:57AM -0700, James Evans wrote: > Hi -- I'm just curious to see if anyone has thoughts > about running JtR on the new Cell Processor. This topic was briefly raised in here before, but it was not seriously discussed. > IBM just released a new SDK for it, > http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/cellsw?open&S_TACT=105AGX16&S_CMP=DWPA Interesting stuff. > I would take a guess that JtR could be optimized to > run very quickly using the Cell's architecture, Yes. > ... it is going to be hard to write code which can > fully exploit the Cell. That's true. > However, I think it may be easier in the case of JtR Well, one potential way to do it might be to treat SPEs as a special case of network nodes, once distributed processing support is added. I wish I had the time to play with this. Unfortunately, I don't expect to find the time unless there's commercial demand. Maybe I could approach some IBM folks suggesting that this could be a great example of performance improvement with the Cell. > (I did see in the code some > mention of AltiVec, but that would only exploit the > core of the Cell rather than its SPEs). Correct. -- Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com> GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598 http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments -- To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.