Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:27:07 +0200 From: "websiteaccess@...il.com" <websiteaccess@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Challenge : some results Le Wed, 5 Apr 2006 22:32:20 +0400, Solar Designer a écrit: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:08:05PM +0200, websiteaccess@...il.com wrote: >> Katelyn: >> PASSLIST : Challenge.txt >> WORDLIST SIZE : 4,893,366 words >> DECRYPTED : 192 >> TIME : 78 minutes >> >> Website : >> PASSLIST : Challenge.txt >> WORDLIST SIZE : 72,343 words >> DECRYPTED : 255 >> TIME : 95 minutes > > I don't know what Katelyn and Website mean or why you're posting this, > but you can further improve your results by simply picking the 255 > cracked passwords and placing them into a 255-entry "wordlist". ;-) > Well, If you don't have a supercomputer and not 15 years before you, how crack maximum passwords ??? -> have a very good short wordlist and some highly optimized rules. As you can see, more 4 millions words are not more effective than only 72 000 specialized words. Less words = less time to crack , no ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.