Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:39:35 +0100 From: "thomas springer" <thomas.springer@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: jumbo pure win32 build michal, you're a hero! lm and ntlm tested and working, speed here seems to be about the same like the cygwin-version. I usually "nice" john using the win-taskmgr - instead of using the "idle"-mode. tom On 2/25/06, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:04:19AM +0100, Michal Luczaj wrote: > > Well, it managed to compile it without any problems with MinGW under > > pure DOS command box (WinXP, *NOT* cygwin!), it passed benchmark tests, > > it even cracked some passwords. But, uhm, I don't know if it really > > works. I really don't :> > > The patch is rather small. :-) > > You had to drop the support for "Idle = Y" - any chance you would > implement it with native Win32 calls? > > Also, you're assuming that CLK_TCK and CLOCKS_PER_SEC are the same - > which does not have to be the case (although it may be the case for > current MinGW if you say that the benchmark works right). > > Thanks, > > -- > Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com> > GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598 > http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply > to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you. > > -- thomas.springer@...il.com [nach mir der synflood.]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.