Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:07:06 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: 2 Qs on john1.6 (stable) On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:53:11AM +0200, Christian Karpp wrote: > Solar Designer wrote: > >You might get around this by reducing the compiler's optimization level > >(e.g., replace the -O2 with -O1) for all or for some source files (you > >can compile DES_std.c into DES_std.o invoking cc manually). > > Good hint. Unfortunately I have to skip optimization completely under > AIX 5.3 for BSDI DES (x725), Kerberos AFS DES and NT LM DES in order for > the benchmark not to fail. The results however are dramatically lower > than with optimization - on all tests. Pity. Well, perhaps you can complain to xlC developers? > BTW, I've used john-1.6.38 this time... With that version, NT LM DES shouldn't be failing anymore even when DES_std.c is miscompiled. -- Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com> GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598 http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments Was I helpful? Please give your feedback here: http://rate.affero.net/solar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.