[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:39:51 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: multi-threaded hash table initialization
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:37:18AM +0200, magnum wrote:
> FYI your patch doesn't apply cleanly to current bleeding (despite, I'm
> pretty sure, there should be no clash at all with recent commits). This
> happened with one of your patches yesterday also and it's probably very
> trival this time too but it'll take me some head scratching and thus
> some delay. It's not really a problem, just wanted to let you know.
Sorry about that. I am working with a tree from 2 days ago, which
already has a mix of my changes over these 2 days in it. I try to
extract the individual changes as separate patches, but perhaps I do so
non-perfectly.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
