Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:39:51 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: multi-threaded hash table initialization On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:37:18AM +0200, magnum wrote: > FYI your patch doesn't apply cleanly to current bleeding (despite, I'm > pretty sure, there should be no clash at all with recent commits). This > happened with one of your patches yesterday also and it's probably very > trival this time too but it'll take me some head scratching and thus > some delay. It's not really a problem, just wanted to let you know. Sorry about that. I am working with a tree from 2 days ago, which already has a mix of my changes over these 2 days in it. I try to extract the individual changes as separate patches, but perhaps I do so non-perfectly. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.