Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:26:47 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SHA-1 H() Lei, On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:04:21AM +0800, Lei Zhang wrote: > The format prefix 'pbkdf2-hmac-' is omitted below. > > On ARM (2xOMP): > > [before] > MD4: 2576 c/s real, 1288 c/s virtual > MD5: 1651 c/s real, 825 c/s virtual > SHA1: 578 c/s real, 290 c/s virtual > > [after] > MD4: 2608 c/s real, 1304 c/s virtual > MD5: 1600 c/s real, 803 c/s virtual > SHA1: 501 c/s real, 250 c/s virtual > > MD4 becomes a little bit faster; MD5 & SHA1 become slower. For MD5, you can (and should) repair this with OR-NOT. For SHA-1, please investigate: take a look at the generated code in both cases. > On Power (8xOMP, bound to a single core) > > [before] > MD4: 28248 c/s real, 3531 c/s virtual > MD5: 19980 c/s real, 2497 c/s virtual > SHA1: 10593 c/s real, 1322 c/s virtual > > [after] > MD4: 31207 c/s real, 3882 c/s virtual > MD5: 19980 c/s real, 2489 c/s virtual > SHA1: 11273 c/s real, 1409 c/s virtual > > On Power (1xOMP) > > [before] > MD4: 13398 c/s real, 13398 c/s virtual > MD5: 10626 c/s real, 10626 c/s virtual > SHA1: 8533 c/s real, 8533 c/s virtual > > [after] > MD4: 14628 c/s real, 14628 c/s virtual > MD5: 10935 c/s real, 10935 c/s virtual > SHA1: 8947 c/s real, 8947 c/s virtual > > At least there's no performance drop on Power. BTW, It looks Power's SMT performance is not very impressive. Why, a 2x+ speedup compared to 1 thread is very good. It's similar to or even better than what we're seeing with interleaving on x86. Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.